Previous set of photos that has been breaking Considered by Facebook

Previous set of photos that has been breaking Considered by Facebook

Photo Violates Facebook

- Social networking giant Facebook is not a little class to reap a wide range of news, one of the photos uploaded and ketentun violate community guidelines. Limitations of a good video content, status or photo violates facebook is still unclear as to what standards. Until this very day still overwhelmed facebook monitor all of the content that is in facebook and not uncommon to have to apologize for the photo were unilaterally removed by facebook for violating. And here are some examples of photos that were previously deemed to have been violated by facebook, but it was returned because of a misunderstanding.

1. Violated because it resembles a woman's breast
Facebook opposes photos elbow, elbow least resembling breasts. That was the conclusion of a recent Facebook experiment was carried out by the operator theory of Understanding Deep It (TOTDUOT) Tumblr, which set out to demonstrate the fault of social media in the way the sensor.

To prove their point, the people behind Tumblr published a photograph showing a woman in a bathtub with her elbow leaning on the side of foaming. However, at first glance one could be mistaken for breast elbow giant one-armed woman. Within 24 hours, the photo was removed Facebook and email sent to TOTDUOT, told the group that the images they have violated international Declaration on the Right and Responsibility. After realizing his mistake, Facebook sends an apology for the mistake.

2. Violated because it shows breasts and ass

Facebook removes photos digitally sliced ​​a woman showing her breasts and buttocks. In October 2012, the Australian men's magazine Zoo Weekly posted a photo of a bikini-clad woman, cut in half at the torso, as part of the game "Left or right?", In which the publication is asking readers to choose which side they prefer. Photos' breasts or buttocks, "which has now been removed, the man asked which parts they like and why.

Comments from fans of Zoo Weekly in the photo blatant gender discrimination. BuzzFeed mengposting screenshots of some of the comments, including the 'Right' because two holes are better than one, "and" left "because they can make me a sandwich.

3. Violated because the image defects

A mother angrily demanding answers from Facebook about why they delete photos on the website he put his son, who was born with a rare congenital defect, and then block him from the site altogether.

Grayson James Walker of Memphis, Tennessee was born on February 15, 2012 with Anencephaly, a rare congenital neural tube defect that causes babies to be born without the part of the brain and skull.

After repeatedly putting deleted pictures on her profile, her account has been temporarily disabled. Heather said she did not know which category his picture without hat included in, but has now launched the protest by posting an image several times and get your friends and family to contact Facebook.

4. Violated because the name of the city that are "offensive".

Facebook has banned the name of an Irish town, labeled as "offensive," which raises the question of whether or not the dirty word filter that cause more problems than they solve.

The city, Effin, containing the same spelling as the common alternative to dirty word beginning with "F", but is actually a real place in County Limerick in Ireland who have been there for hundreds of years.

In fact, the name is derived from the Irish pronunciation Saint Eimhin, a bishop of the early Christian history of Ireland.

Employees of the University of Limerick, Ann Marie Kennedy, has been campaigning to get the hometown recognized by the social network, as far as it will not allow him to enter into the profile.

5. Violated because the photograph Down Syndrome

An American woman banned from Facebook after he put a picture of her Down syndrome. Social networks, where the picture called "inappropriate," has now apologized.

Diana Cornwell, from North Carolina, put the photos her seven-year-old, competing in local special Olympic event on Facebook. When she next logs in, he received a message from website monitoring team said the pictures violated their user agreement.

Cornwell Account disabled for three days until he lowered the photographs. Facebook later apologized for the incident and said "human error" was to blame.

6. Violated because the photo young child feeding

A mother has been banned from Facebook after he uploaded a picture of her children who showed one of them to pretend you are breastfeeding. Lauren Ferrari of Seattle, WA publish controversial photos on social networking sites. The photos show five-year-old daughter and a sister.

Within a few hours, the image is deleted and Facebook says the photo was violated community standards. He is currently blocked for a week. U.S. police said it was an example of "bad parents".

7. Violated because the picture of two men kissing

A photo of two men kissing was removed by Facebook for violating the code image courtesy restrictions that are "political, sexual or sensitive". The photos were taken Juan Hidalgo, a photographer famous Spaniard, for cultural groups based in Madrid as part of the 'Work of Art Gay Seeking Home' initiative and documentaries. Instead, this project has put a censored version of the image, as shown above.

Then, a Facebook spokesman contacted Towleroad and said that the photo had been restored. "Upon investigation, we concluded ad does not violate our guidelines and was removed in error and the ad is now running. Sorry for the inconvenience."

8. Violated because there are signs censored

This is something that has been going on for centuries. When a 4 year old daughter and her friend decided to drop their pants and pee in the backyard fence, we can only hope that they have a practical camera to capture priceless images. So, that's what mothers do. The images he considers the best shots over the summer was rejected by Facebook.

You may be wondering why there is a censored sign over their butt? Well, Facebook contacted her and asked her to remove the picture because it violates their terms of service.

9. Violated because the photo semi nude paintings

Even the Vatican does not have a problem anymore with semi nude painting of Mother Mary nursing baby Jesus. However, it seems this is a problem for Facebook.

Long been criticized for banning photos of breastfeeding, the popular social networking site repeatedly removing three nursing mother paintings are posted by the artist Kate Hansen. Part of the art project "Madonna and Child Project", the art has twice tersepak of the Facebook group for figure and portrait artist. Meanwhile, Facebook said the painting was accidentally deleted Hansen. (Not accidentally deleted three times??? Were bener wrote?)


Source Previous set of photos that has been breaking Considered by Facebook